The current research sought to validate the Chernyshenko Conscientiousness Scales (CCS), a novel measure designed to assess six facets of conscientiousness. Data from 7,569 U.S. participants and 649 U.K. participants were analyzed to assess the internal reliability and factorial structure of the scales. Test–retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and criterion-related validity were also evaluated using a separate U.K. sample (n = 118; n = 80 for test–retest). The results showed that those items designed to measure industriousness, order, self-control, traditionalism, and virtue were best represented by a five-factor structure, broadly consistent with the five scales. However, the content and structure of the responsibility scale requires further investigation. Overall, the CCS has the potential to be a useful alternative to the faceted measures of conscientiousness that are currently available. However, future research is required to refine a number of problematic items and to clarify which facets can be better described as interstitial dimensions between conscientiousness and other Big Five domains.
展开▼
机译：当前的研究试图验证车尔尼申科责任感量表（CCS），这是一种旨在评估责任感的六个方面的新颖措施。分析了来自7,569名美国参与者和649名英国参与者的数据，以评估量表的内部可靠性和阶乘结构。重试信度，收敛效度和发散度效度以及与准则相关的效度也使用单独的英国样本进行了评估（n = 118； n = 80）。结果表明，旨在衡量勤奋，秩序，自我控制，传统主义和美德的那些项目，最好由五要素结构代表，与五种量表大致一致。但是，责任量表的内容和结构需要进一步调查。总体而言，CCS有可能成为有用的替代措施，以取代目前可用的认真措施。但是，需要进一步的研究来完善一些有问题的项目，并弄清哪些方面可以更好地描述为尽职调查和其他五大领域之间的间隙维度。
展开▼
